The original CLA may have same items and I just did not catch that casual
verbal / oral conversations unless prefaced with "this is not a contribution"
would be considered a contribution. For me, that puts a chill on discussing
with any LL employee the technical feasibility of an idea that may or may not
become a contribution.
>________________________________
> From: Oz Linden (Scott Lawrence) <o...@lindenlab.com>
>To: opensource-dev <opensource-dev@lists.secondlife.com>
>Sent: Monday, October 7, 2013 11:34 AM
>Subject: [opensource-dev] Draft update to the Contribution Agreement
>
>
>
>As most of you probably know, Linden Lab acquired Desura™, a digital
>distribution service for PC gamers.
>
>The code for the Desura client is open source, managed as the Desurium project
>on github. The Desurium project used a different open source licenses (GPLv3)
>than we use for the Second Life Viewer project, and had its own Contribution
>Agreement.
>
>After some discussion with both Second Life and Desurium
contributors, Linden Lab has produced a draft of a new Contributor License
Agreement that we would like to use for both projects in the future. This
email is an invitation to contributors and potential contributors to discuss
that draft here.
>
>
>--
>
>Scott Lawrence | Director of Open Development
>Skype ozlinden | Second Life Oz Linden
>
>Linden Lab| Makers of Shared Creative Spaces
>Check out what we're working on!
>_______________________________________________
>Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
>http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
>Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
>
>_______________________________________________
Policies and (un)subscribe information available here:
http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev
Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
