Hmm.. maybe change that build environment to something that is actually compatibel to something that users might have? as in, not using compiler versions / library versions that aren't available from official repositories for the distribution in question (prebuilt libs excluded)?
Alternative: package the compiler toolchain as a prebuilt archive, d/l and unpack into the source tree on build. preferrably as statically linked stuff. cheers LC Am 04.09.2014 um 20:14 schrieb Monty Brandenberg: > On 9/4/2014 11:00 AM, Lance Corrimal wrote: >> Hi, >> >> >> I guess noone else builds on linux AND tries to actually have a build >> environment that is exactly the same as the one Ll uses... Since it is NOT >> DOCUMENTED. > Nobody would *want* the exact same build environment that we use. > But Oz is, I believe, running down the info on the tool chain > components. We're large enough that that info is stuck in a silo > somewhere and we have to blast it out. > > m > _______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
