>>Please forgive me if this should already be on my plate, but I don't >>recall a Jira about the openjpeg 1.5.1 issues? Does 1.5.1 fail to load >>texture files that are correctly handled by 1.5.0?
Yes. openjpeg-1.5.1 has so many textures marked as over-sized and unavailable that the viewer is unusable. This came about with viewer64 as the default viewer is still on openjpeg-1.4.0. I had seen the same texture missing message once while using Project Alex Ivy viewer and filed a jira on that instance at https://jira.secondlife.com/browse/BUG-41228 . I am making a wild guess, but I think there is a possible CDN delivery issue that openjpeg-1.5.1 may be prone to more so than openjpeg-1.5.0 or KDU. I had not known of openjpeg-1.5.0 every being supplied in a viewer or I would have certainly looked for it. On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 9:14 AM, Cinder Roxley <cin...@alchemyviewer.org> wrote: > We’ve had OpenJPEG 1.5.1 running solidly on Alchemy for years now. I can > put together some patches to get it working. > > -- > Cinder Roxley > Sent with Airmail > > On January 17, 2017 at 9:03:11 AM, Nat Goodspeed (n...@lindenlab.com) > wrote: > > Nat Goodspeed <n...@lindenlab.com> erian <nickyper...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > https://bitbucket.org/lindenlab/p64_3p-openjpeg/pull-requests/2 > > > > Please take this in and then provide for the updated archives in the > viewer. I also received a report that the missing texture issue is in macOS > when using openjpeg-1.5.1. > > There are admittedly painful aspects to the two-step autobuild > mechanism: (1) rebuild the 3p package and (2) update every consumer. > > However, one of the benefits of that approach is that we can adjust > the version of a given 3p package consumed by (e.g.) the viewer > without actually having to revert the 3p repository source. We can > just change back the package URL specified in the viewer's > autobuild.xml. > > > Or, if the problem with 1.5.1 is easily corrected.... > > Please forgive me if this should already be on my plate, but I don't > recall a Jira about the openjpeg 1.5.1 issues? Does 1.5.1 fail to load > texture files that are correctly handled by 1.5.0? > > I think Cinder has a point: if we can move forward with 1.5.1, we should. > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges > > > _______________________________________________ > Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: > http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev > Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting > privileges >
_______________________________________________ Policies and (un)subscribe information available here: http://wiki.secondlife.com/wiki/OpenSource-Dev Please read the policies before posting to keep unmoderated posting privileges
