https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2038
--- Comment #2 from proctor <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #1) > Some options: > > 1. Separate option > > PermitROpen 2000 2001 2002 3000-3999 > > 2. Reuse PermitOpen, but treat numbers without ':' as -R port numbers > > PermitOpen 127.0.0.1:1234 2000 2001 2002 3000-3999 > > The advantage of (1) is that we can extend it to allow selection of > bind address, but (2) can't do this... from my point of view either one of these solutions would be _very_ welcome. although i don't require it at this moment, i can certainly imagine scenarios where control over bind address would be valuable. are there any drawbacks to option one? sincerely, proctor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. _______________________________________________ openssh-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-bugs
