https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2142
--- Comment #2 from Loganaden Velvindron <[email protected]> --- So libseccomp would be "untrusted", similar to kerberos ? libseccomp has seen steady progress, and I think that it would be nice if openssh takes advantage of it if it is deployed on a fairly recent linux system. http://www.paul-moore.com/files/lj/libseccomp-pmoore-lss2012-r1.pdf Please see page 3 :-) Capsicum is also working towards a similar approach with libcapsicum & libangel. (https://code.google.com/p/capsicum-core/) I'm not suggesting replacing will's seccomp patch, but rather provide it as an additional build time option that package maintainers can take advantage of if libseccomp is present. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. _______________________________________________ openssh-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-bugs
