On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Mark D. Baushke wrote: > Other alternatives would mean writing another RFC to deal with a new > public key algorithm name or set of names to handle the key sizes and > hash algorithms you want to allow.
Or just abandoning DSA for ECDSA. It has the advantages of already being implemented, being faster and offering a better security level (assuming NIST/NSA haven't some exquisite backdoor in the curves). -d _______________________________________________ openssh-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-bugs
