https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2525
Darren Tucker <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|REOPENED |RESOLVED --- Comment #5 from Darren Tucker <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Michael J Evans from comment #4) > I disagree with /your/ opinion. As a user who frequently has > temporary systems up for service As one of the maintainers of the software, I feel that my opinion on what does and does not go into the software is somewhat relevant. > I already effectively use -o > Insecure, but via shell scripts which provide an incomplete solution > and a clunkier interface. Both of them do exactly what you want so are by definition complete. You are of course welcome to dislike the interface. > Just because /your/ use cases are satisfied by > providing longer harder to remember configurations on the command > line or by coding in to more persistent configuration files one time > exceptions does not mean that the use cases of others is satisfied. Different people's needs are different, that's why there's a config file. As shown in comment #3, you can already do what you want via the config file, and assuming you use "insecure" as the Host entry, it's only 5 keystrokes more than your proposal (less if you use a shorter name) and infinity percent less code. So, sorry but no I don't think this is worth doing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug. You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. _______________________________________________ openssh-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-bugs
