https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2949

--- Comment #2 from Mike Frysinger <[email protected]> ---
i tried to account for that here:
> If the server doesn't enforce a specific limit, then the field may be set to 
> 0.
> This implies the server relies on the OS to enforce limits (e.g. available
> memory or file handles), and such limits might be dynamic.  The client SHOULD
> take care to not try to exceed reasonable limits.

i think that covers it ?

wrt 32bit vs 64bit, i couldn't imagine a situation where a single
packet would hit that, but i guess if we're laying groundwork for a
protocol that will stick around for decades, might as well plan for
then rather than regret it.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug.
_______________________________________________
openssh-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-bugs

Reply via email to