https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3181
Darren Tucker <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME --- Comment #8 from Darren Tucker <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Corinna Vinschen from comment #6) > Oh, wait! > > Before applying a potentially dangerous patch to OpenSSH, did anybody > actually test this on the latest Cygwin 3.1.5? Well I didn't apply this potentially dangerous patch because I wasn't sure about it, which is why I asked for your opinion in comment #4 :-) I did, however, add a regression test for this particular behaviour: https://github.com/openssh/openssh-portable/commit/5dba1fcabacaab46693338ec829b42a1293d1f52. And while I do occasionally update Cygwin on my test VM, I didn't think to do it in this case since I'd done it somewhat recently and it's not the kind of behaviour that usually changes. I updated it and indeed, the test now passes: $ make t-exec LTESTS=agent-subprocess [...] run test agent-subprocess.sh ... ok agent subprocess make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/builder/openssh.anongit/regress' all t-exec passed Thanks for the help and sorry for the noise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching someone on the CC list of the bug. You are watching the assignee of the bug. _______________________________________________ openssh-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mindrot.org/mailman/listinfo/openssh-bugs
