The branch master has been updated
via c70ac3b9e35ab7789c8ed3070fadacdf0ebe2ec1 (commit)
from fa107776f99dc0ee563cb9c62373902ba8677806 (commit)
- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit c70ac3b9e35ab7789c8ed3070fadacdf0ebe2ec1
Author: Pauli <paul.d...@oracle.com>
Date: Tue Jun 13 14:18:13 2017 +1000
The question:
Why does compilation fail due to an undefined symbol
NID_uniqueIdentifier?
is ancient & has been moved to the old faq section.
Reviewed-by: Matt Caswell <m...@openssl.org>
(Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/10)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Summary of changes:
docs/faq-3-prog.txt | 7 -------
docs/faq-6-old.txt | 8 ++++++++
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/faq-3-prog.txt b/docs/faq-3-prog.txt
index e86727b..6969e75 100644
--- a/docs/faq-3-prog.txt
+++ b/docs/faq-3-prog.txt
@@ -212,13 +212,6 @@ Due to the TLS protocol definition, a client will only
send a certificate,
if explicitly asked by the server. Use the SSL_VERIFY_PEER flag of the
SSL_CTX_set_verify(3) function to enable the use of client certificates.
-* Why does compilation fail due to an undefined symbol NID_uniqueIdentifier?
-
-For OpenSSL 0.9.7 the OID table was extended and corrected. In earlier
-versions, uniqueIdentifier was incorrectly used for X.509 certificates.
-The correct name according to RFC2256 (LDAP) is x500UniqueIdentifier.
-Change your code to use the new name when compiling against OpenSSL 0.9.7.
-
* I think I've detected a memory leak, is this a bug?
In most cases the cause of an apparent memory leak is an OpenSSL internal table
diff --git a/docs/faq-6-old.txt b/docs/faq-6-old.txt
index b055570..708771a 100644
--- a/docs/faq-6-old.txt
+++ b/docs/faq-6-old.txt
@@ -4,3 +4,11 @@ Older Versions and Platforms
Any OpenSSL release before 1.0.2, and any platform that is not in wide use,
and doesn't get full support. Or something like that.
+
+* Why does compilation fail due to an undefined symbol NID_uniqueIdentifier?
+
+For OpenSSL 0.9.7 the OID table was extended and corrected. In earlier
+versions, uniqueIdentifier was incorrectly used for X.509 certificates.
+The correct name according to RFC2256 (LDAP) is x500UniqueIdentifier.
+Change your code to use the new name when compiling against OpenSSL 0.9.7.
+
_____
openssl-commits mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-commits
