The branch master has been updated
       via  afe9bba749b9fd897b7e7d416d904852d867d2c2 (commit)
      from  eed3ec90478af1e1fd3a2733293c751d2181f7f7 (commit)


- Log -----------------------------------------------------------------
commit afe9bba749b9fd897b7e7d416d904852d867d2c2
Author: Richard Levitte <levi...@openssl.org>
Date:   Tue Jun 27 11:25:03 2017 +0200

    crypto/mem.c: on Windows, use rand() instead of random()
    
    Windows doesn't provide random().  In this particular case, our
    requirements on the quality of randomness isn't high, so we don't
    need to care how good randomness rand() does or doesn't provide.
    
    Fixes #3778
    
    Reviewed-by: Rich Salz <rs...@openssl.org>
    (Merged from https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/3779)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Summary of changes:
 crypto/mem.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/crypto/mem.c b/crypto/mem.c
index 0584814..aa5ac56 100644
--- a/crypto/mem.c
+++ b/crypto/mem.c
@@ -112,6 +112,14 @@ static void parseit(void)
 }
 
 /*
+ * Windows doesn't have random(), but it has rand()
+ * Some rand() implementations aren't good, but we're not
+ * dealing with secure randomness here.
+ */
+#ifdef _WIN32
+# define random() rand()
+#endif
+/*
  * See if the current malloc should fail.
  */
 static int shouldfail(void)
_____
openssl-commits mailing list
To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-commits

Reply via email to