printf()s ;) -Kyle H
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 10:20 PM, Ger Hobbelt <[email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 10, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Steven M. Schweda <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hey. Don't give up so easily. While it's possible to find backing >> for almost any opinion involving an apostrophe, a rule like "plural, not >> possessive" is much too simple to be reliable. See, for example: > > Ha! :-))) > > Well, my Strunk & White (4th ed., 2000 AD) don't say nuttin' about > throwing in an apostrophe here, but, yes, I'm with you. Some of the > way. I have to concede that, yes, I behaved too much like a meek sheep > in this. > > > Ignoring the fundamental flaw in the entire argument for a moment, the > google output seems overwhelming, yet trusting google democracy / vox > populi, which we all know since Churchill at the very last, is not > really leading the way towards reaching the pinnacle of brainiac > achievement either. > > Given the graveness of the issue, I will retire to HQ and ponder this > sorry affair. > > A suitable, definite statement to settle the matter will be forthcoming > shortly. > > -- > Met vriendelijke groeten / Best regards, > > Ger Hobbelt > > -------------------------------------------------- > web: http://www.hobbelt.com/ > http://www.hebbut.net/ > mail: [email protected] > mobile: +31-6-11 120 978 > -------------------------------------------------- > ______________________________________________________________________ > OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org > Development Mailing List [email protected] > Automated List Manager [email protected] > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
