In my opinion the patch is also not necessary, because dtls1_buffer_message() requires a pointer to some 64 bit data to be used as the priority for the queue. However, s->s3->rrec.seq_num already is a pointer, since it is an array. Using &(s->s3->rrec.seq_num) usually returns the same value, i.e. the pointer to the first value of the array, but I'm not sure if that's always the case.
Regards, Robin On Apr 14, 2010, at 2:20 AM, Stephen Henson via RT wrote: > Patch has already been reverted. Presumably the 0.9.8 one (Checkin > #19561) is OK? > > Steve. > -- > Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer. > Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org > ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
