On Thu, Nov 18, 2010, Richard Levitte wrote:

> I'm trying to catch up on VMS fixes, and with the 0.9.8 and 1.0.0
> series, it seems pretty straightforward.
> 
> With 1.0.1 (in development), it seems like things are going down,
> pretty much.
> 

At least with 1.0.1 we can totally overhaul the thing (subject to binary
compatibility) as nothing is set in stone.

TBH it looks like most of the stuff in dtls1.h shouldn't be touched by
applications anyway: although those structures were exposed in 1.0.0. Is
anything likely to be broken by making the lot opaque except for the DTLS code
that needs it?

Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. OpenSSL project core developer.
Commercial tech support now available see: http://www.openssl.org
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [email protected]
Automated List Manager                           [email protected]

Reply via email to