On 24 April 2014 03:23, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <[email protected]> wrote: > > If the bulk of the relevant documentation was all very close to the code > (e.g. like doxygen or other structured formats automatically > extractable), i think it would make it easier to find most of it and > make sure that changes also include changes to the relevant documentation. > >> Plus a parallel effort to backfill the documentation gaps and errors. > > Looking at the size of the documentation overall, this is a *lot* of > work. Is anyone interested in organizing a documentation sprint to do > this kind of backfill labor in an organized and complete way?
Yes - potentially. As I noted in my other email I am running some experiments on this now. I'd like to get dev team input on the results of that before going too far down this road though. Matt ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [email protected] Automated List Manager [email protected]
