On 8/26/16, 17:04, "openssl-dev on behalf of Andy Polyakov" <openssl-dev-boun...@openssl.org on behalf of ap...@openssl.org> wrote:
>So suggestion is to impose /arch:ia32 on all users. Well, I personally >have lesser problem with that (as most most performance-critical >assembly code paths will be compiled anyway, processor capabilities >detected at run-time, and inappropriate paths will be avoided), but I'm >not sure if all users would appreciate it. Normally I don’t use Windows, so shouldn’t care. However, as occasionally I do stumble across a Windows system - I’d *much* dislike being stuck with /arch:ia32. 20 years ago I might have had a different opinion. ;) > Note that it's possible to >set CL environment variable to add options of your preference without >modifying anything. And that’s probably what the requester should do, IMHO. >Maybe that would be more adequate option to >customize builds for specific needs. In worst case it would be >appropriate to tie this option to no-sse2 configuration option, but not >unconditionally... Maybe…
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
-- openssl-dev mailing list To unsubscribe: https://mta.openssl.org/mailman/listinfo/openssl-dev
