On Sat, 2 Jan 1999, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:

> I want to propose a less spreaded layout like and the use of a
> openssl.cnf instead of ssleay.cnf:
> 
> >     bin       <-- openssl program
> >     etc       <-- openssl.cnf, certificates, private keys
> >     include   <-- header files
> >     lib       <-- library files
> 
> This is a small top-level layout which then fits into all dedicated
> hierarchies and 99% of all shared hierarchies. I'm sure package
> maintainers and other filesystem fanatics like this. At least
> (independed whether it's good or bad) it's the way hundrets of
> existing packages already install theirself ;-)

How about making the each of the locations compile-time defined. I
would like to (for example) put binaries in /usr/bin, configuration
data, certs and keys in /etc/openssl/certs and /etc/openssl/keys, etc.

This would also be a great boon to binary package makers.

The SSLeay-0.9.1b RPM already includes some patches which do some of 
this. I can forward them if you wish.

Regards,
Damien Miller

PS. Is there a TODO/Wishlist for OpenSSL anywhere?

--
| "Bombay is 250ms from New York in the new world order" - Alan Cox
| Damien Miller - http://www.ilogic.com.au/~dmiller

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to