On Mon, Jan 11, 1999, Roeland M.J. Meyer wrote:
> At 03:51 PM 1/11/99 +0000, Ben Laurie wrote:
>
> >I'd suggest that the functionality should really go into OpenSSL, since
> >it is a common requirement. Naturally whatever software is using OpenSSL
> >will have to handle the configuration (unless we put it in
> >openssl.conf?).
>
> This brings up another question.
>
> Are these two the same? If not, can I use Open-SSL in place of SSLeay for
> Apache v1.3.2 and the Ben 1.25 ?
OpenSSL 0.9.1c is the same as SSLeay, at least "optically", so you can use it
without changes. For the forthcoming OpenSSL 0.9.2 Ben has to just add support
to Apache-SSL for the new "openssl" binary. For mod_ssl this is already done.
More is usually not needed. Actually it will be the other way round:
Supporting the old SSLeay versions gets harder when new features are present
in OpenSSL.
BTW, Apache 1.3.2 and Ben-SSL 1.25 are not the current versions.
Ralf S. Engelschall
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.engelschall.com
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
