[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I don't understand why US people can't be given access to the source
> tree.
I didn't understand that, either, but it didn't seem worth quibbling,
because there are other reasons, anyway...
> Is it because of a desire to "prove" that nobody from the US exported
> source code? Surely that's (a) too big a hammer (we can, e.g., con-
> tribute to the ASN1 engine); (b) probably not sufficient proof; and
> (c) starting down a slippery slope that OpenSSL really should avoid --
> setting up mechanisms to help "enforce" every participating country's
> crypto export rules?
Certainly I have no interest in enforcing the US's export rules (or any
that I don't have to), or proving anything to do with them.
However, it is probably desirable to split the docco off simply so we
can have a different set of people maintaining it.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
