Mark J Cox wrote:
>
> > Is there likely to be much more of this? Coz the longer its left the
> > harder it gets to incorporate...
>
> Yes, there is some more of this; but it is intermingled with C2Net
> proprietary stuff that I need to extract it from.
I'm curious to know what sort of thing is "C2Net proprietary stuff"?
> I tried to break down
> the changes into a number of distinct self-contained changes that I can
> apply over time after going through each one. As we know the SSLeay team
> didn't use CVS so finding out reasons for changes to the code base can
> only be done by reading every line. The major bits were the BN and SSL
> bits. There are also some CAST fixes.
I've probably already done those but it'd be worth checking anyway.
> I'm not able to test the resultant code thoroughly however, so
> it may break for people. I was concerned about the ssl changes as they
> are a fairly major change and have not been part of C2Net products so
> they've not seen any public testing yet.
They may be less major than they look at first sight (a large number of
them are just moving stats to a separate data structure), but I guess
the best way to test them is to fold them in!
Cheers,
Ben.
--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html
"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
- Indira Gandhi
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]