Mark J Cox wrote:
> 
> > Is there likely to be much more of this? Coz the longer its left the
> > harder it gets to incorporate...
> 
> Yes, there is some more of this; but it is intermingled with C2Net
> proprietary stuff that I need to extract it from.

I'm curious to know what sort of thing is "C2Net proprietary stuff"?

>  I tried to break down
> the changes into a number of distinct self-contained changes that I can
> apply over time after going through each one.  As we know the SSLeay team
> didn't use CVS so finding out reasons for changes to the code base can
> only be done by reading every line.  The major bits were the BN and SSL
> bits.  There are also some CAST fixes.

I've probably already done those but it'd be worth checking anyway.

> I'm not able to test the resultant code thoroughly however, so
> it may break for people.  I was concerned about the ssl changes as they
> are a fairly major change and have not been part of C2Net products so
> they've not seen any public testing yet.

They may be less major than they look at first sight (a large number of
them are just moving stats to a separate data structure), but I guess
the best way to test them is to fold them in!

Cheers,

Ben.

--
http://www.apache-ssl.org/ben.html

"My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
first group; there was less competition there."
     - Indira Gandhi
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to