Ulrich Kroener wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
>
> Someone asked me why I was using the kr cc at all. Well, I also use the aCC (C++)
> compiler, which includes the RW Tools.h++ classes, and it would be some major
> work to rewrite and retest the build using gcc/g++. And I don't have a license for
> the ANSI C product. If I would use gcc for the OpenSSL libs only, I would probably
> get linking errors, because of different naming conventions. Also, can anyone tell
> me how I can debug a library compiled with gcc under HPUX xdb? I'd be grateful.
>
Considering the large number of changes need to restore K&R
compatability (I hadn't realised it had been ANSIfied to the extent it
has) and the overhead of maintaining it I think I must reluctantly agree
that K&R support should be dropped.
Sorry, Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk/
Senior crypto engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/
Core developer of the OpenSSL project: http://www.openssl.org/
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key: via homepage.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
