On Mon, 29 Mar 1999, Ulf [iso-8859-1] M�ller wrote:
> If the BSD folks make incompatible changes to the definition, they
> ought to change the name, too.
>
> Renaming the structure in OpenSSL is a bad idea. Otherwise, once
> FreeBSD upgrades to the current version, we have to change it again,
> etc.
If anything, I've noticed that there were a few headers that conflicted
with local ones here. The ones I caught were err.h and md5.h. I'm
thinking that perhaps an easy way to accomplish this would be to create a
"namespace" for the SSL headers. Since it seems like md5.h and err.h
aren't going to be included directly... they could fit in say <ssl/*>....
> Probably the best solution for you is not to use libmd at all, and
> make sure the compiler uses the OpenSSL headers. That way, you will
> always have the current MD code and are least likely to run into
> problems. -- In case I overlooked some reasons for using libmd with
> OpenSSL, I'd recommend you post your #ifdefs.
Well, to do that, I'd have to put /usr/local/include before /usr/include
on the include search path. Not somethign I'm terribly interested in.
- alex
You better believe that marijuana can cause castration. Just suppose your
girlfriend gets the munchies!
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
