On Wed, Mar 31, 1999 at 04:03:04PM +0200, Andy Polyako wrotev:
>> O.K. Then I propose deleting (rather then recreating) all those
>> automatically generated assembler versions, with appropriate changes
>> to the configuration script.
> i don't get it! has anybody read my posts? does it get through at all?
> well, it must, because i myself get my messages echoed back from the
> list...
For the general case (everything except *-usparc-*), your proposal
amounted to just that, didn't it?
Your proposed changed line for Configure is probably not meant
literally, though (even after removing the extra line-breaks
introduced by your text-editor or mail software :-):
"solaris-sparc-sc4","cc:-xarch=v8 -xstrconst -xO5 -xdepend -Xa -DB_ENDIAN
-DBN_DIV2W:-lsocket -lnsl:\
BN_LLONG RC4_CHAR DES_PTR DES_RISC1 DES_UNROLL BF_PTR:asm/sparc.o::",
asm/sparc.o is a file that you do _not_ want to use in that case, if I
understand you correctly, because the -xarch=v8 option allows us to
use bn_am.c for sc4 without performance problems. Correct?
Your new assembler implementation for the usparc cases I have not
tested yet. Obviously it still needs to be integrated in the
Configure/Makefile mechanisms. So we'd need a new configuration
variant "solaris-usparc-gcc", right?
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
