ulf> While we are adding new stuff for 0.9.3, shouldn't we set
ulf> OPENSSL_VERSION_NUMBER to some value greater than 0x0922 and
ulf> less than 0x0930?
Just out of the blue, we could use a scheme similar what RMS does with
emacs. With emacs, version x.y.90 is the prerelease of x.y+1... A
similar scheme would be to have for example 0x0929 (0.9.2i), or
perhaps 0x093f (0.9.3o) as the "prerelease" of 0.9.3?
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-161 43 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
