Tom Titchener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Attached please find a compressed tar file containing patches and
> sources implementing with the OpenSSL libraries:
> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-pkix-ocsp-07.txt
> Here's a summary of the files you get:
[...]
> mk1mf.pl.patch clone rules to build library for ocsp
($ssl,$crypto)=("ssl","crypto","ocsp");
I bet you meant
($ssl,$crypto,$ocsp)=("ssl","crypto","ocsp");
-- your patch to util/pl/VC-32.pl (with $cosp = "ocsp32") fixes it
for that specific case (can VC-16.pl be ignored now?).
But does anyone ever use makefile.one for Unix platforms, or at least
test it? util/pl/ contains BC-16.pl, BC-32.pl, VC-16.pl, VC-32.pl,
linux.pl, ultrix.pl, unix.pl. The top Makefile{.org,ssl} calls
mk1mf.pl without any argument, and INSTALL.W32 plus do_ms.bat use only
VC-* (BC-* is not even finished according to INSTALL.W32). There's a
script util/FreeBSD.sh which calls mk1mf.pl FreeBSD (which in turn
uses util/pl/unix.pl) -- is this ever used? I'm not too happy with
having so much stuff buried in various perl scripts ... Also,
ms/do_ms.bat has a semi-doppleganger util/do_ms.sh with different
lines commented out (and the additional difference that do_ms.bat uses
no-asm for 32 bit cases while do_ms.sh doesn't).
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
