> ... but it won't just be > cosmetic changes. Should we really leave the code as it as for now > (with my small comments of the form /* XXX ... */ that mark things to > be changed and which, in even briefer style, could be expressed as > /* Argh */) and delay those changes, I really don't understand why the rush! > or should we better expand the > testing period by another week so that the released code will be in a > nicer state? I think you should!!! Andy. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- ATTENTION: Code freeze proposed for today!! Ralf S. Engelschall
- Re: ATTENTION: Code freeze proposed for... Ben Laurie
- Re: ATTENTION: Code freeze proposed for... Bodo Moeller
- Re: ATTENTION: Code freeze proposed... Andy Polyakov
- Re: ATTENTION: Code freeze proposed... Ben Laurie
- Re: ATTENTION: Code freeze prop... Ulf M�ller
- Re: ATTENTION: Code freeze ... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: ATTENTION: Code freeze ... Ben Laurie
- Re: ATTENTION: Code freeze proposed for... Ben Laurie
- Re: ATTENTION: Code freeze proposed for... Ralf S. Engelschall
- Re: ATTENTION: Code freeze proposed... Bodo Moeller
- Re: ATTENTION: Code freeze prop... Bodo Moeller
- Re: ATTENTION: Code freeze proposed for... Mixmaster
- Re: ATTENTION: Code freeze proposed... Bodo Moeller
