I'm sorry!
Yes, I meant "in SSL". I came across the other return value because
SSL_CTX_load_verify_locations() did not check the return code from
X509_LOOKUP_load_file() (via X509_STORE_load_locations()).
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bodo Moeller [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 10, 1999 9:34 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: X509_STORE_load_locations
>
> On Mon, May 10, 1999 at 11:17:34AM +1000, Ron Ramsay wrote:
>
> > return(-2) occurs in crypto/x509/x509_v3.c and
> crypto/x509/x509name.c.
>
> Sorry, the I partially misunderstood your question --
>
> >>> ABTW Has anyone analysed the significance of the return codes. The
> >>> values (in SSL) seem to be -2, -1, 0 or >0 [...]
>
> I thought that "in SSL" referred to the SSL_... functions.
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
> Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
