>>The difference is that des_cblock is defined through a typedef. > >This is correct explanation. So we have to change all the "const des_cblock" back to "des_cblock" in order to have correct C? ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- const errors Ulf M�ller
- Re: const errors Ben Laurie
- Re: const errors Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: const errors Ben Laurie
- Re: const errors Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- RE: const errors Salz, Rich
- Re: const errors Ulf M�ller
- Re: const errors Ben Laurie
