Bodo_Moeller> Bodo Moeller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Bodo_Moeller> > Richard Levitte:
Bodo_Moeller> 
Bodo_Moeller> >> If e_os.h shouldn't be exported, shouldn't it be removed from the
Bodo_Moeller> >> EXHEADER macro in Makefile.org?
Bodo_Moeller> 
Bodo_Moeller> > In theory, yes.  [...] apparently no-one felt like doing that up to
Bodo_Moeller> > now :-)
Bodo_Moeller> 
Bodo_Moeller> Proposal: Make a symlink to e_os.h in each directory where it is
Bodo_Moeller> needed (during make links, like the Makefile => Makefile.ssl)
Bodo_Moeller> and use #include "e_os.h".  This works for the makefile.one case
Bodo_Moeller> without further complications.  Objections, anyone?

Oh, appart from being quite clumsy, especially on operating system
that do not have softlinks (VMS, for example) or even hardlinks (I
can't recall that Winblows would have that, but I may be wrong).  I
haven't looked into the Makefile.one business, but is a bunch of
-I{path} (or whatever turns your compiler on :-)) arguments that
impossible?

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken  \ S-161 43  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
                    \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis             -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to