On Tue, May 25, 1999 at 06:39:50PM +0200, Andy Polyakov wrote: >>> - for (;;) >>> + for (;1;) >> Eh? Why? > Well, to be honest I don't really have a clear clue:-) It just works! I > suppose egcs-1.1.2 optimizer takes it easier on for(;1;) than on > for(;;)... Does while (1) also work? Looks much saner ... ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- 0.9.3 bug ? Al Smith
- Re: 0.9.3 bug ? Ben Laurie
- Re: 0.9.3 bug ? Andy Polyakov
- Re: 0.9.3 bug ? Ben Laurie
- Re: 0.9.3 bug ? Andy Polyakov
- Re: 0.9.3 bug ? Bodo Moeller
- Re: 0.9.3 bug ? Andy Polyakov
- Re: 0.9.3 bug ? Ben Laurie
- Re: 0.9.3 bug ? Al Smith
- Re: 0.9.3 bug ? root
- Re: 0.9.3 bug ? Al Smith
- Re: 0.9.3 bug ? Al Smith
- Re: 0.9.3 bug ? Andy Polyakov
