>> If your assembler only knows 386 opcodes, you'll probably have to use
>> the "386" option to "./config". (bswapl does not exist on the 386.)
> In the SHA assembler code, bswapl is given as its numeric value, so
> this problem would not occur. The problem is that Configure only
> defines the macro SHA1_ASM, but the SHA-0 implementation checks for
> SHA_ASM.
So should all occurrences of SHA_ASM just be changed to SHA1_ASM for
consistency (or, for even more consistency, all occurrences of
SHA1_ASM to SHA_ASM)?
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
