[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> >>>>> "Mixmaster" == Mixmaster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Mixmaster> It looks like cc is now preferred over gcc on the most common platforms
> Mixmaster> where both might be available (like Solaris and HPUX), and that systems
> Mixmaster> where gcc is better will either have it aliased to cc or will not have
> Mixmaster> cc at all. Should config look for cc first and gcc second, instead
> Mixmaster> of the other way around as it is now?
>
> If you do this, it's a good idea to check and make sure that you aren't
> getting /usr/ucb/cc under Solaris. Actually, that's a good idea no matter
> what...
You should definitely check whether either cc or gcc can actually generate
an executable before choosing it. Although this would break
cross-compiling... hmmm
-bp
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
