[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William M. Perry) wrote:
> We also use libtool to build all of our stuff as shared libraries when
> possible.
You're not the first to suggest libtool. Wasn't there some license
conflict with it that meant we couldn't use it?
> So my question is: would people be willing to throw out all the Configure
> and halfway autoconf support if I blew a few hours over the next couple of
> days to completely rework it? This would buy us shared library support as
> well, which I notice was on the todo list in the status reports.
We're constantly fighting problems where a particular version of a compiler
or OS doesn't work quite right, or config generalizes too much and picks a
non-working configuration. If you could come up with something that was
easy to maintain and made it easy to add tests for special cases, that'd
be a big help.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
