>> without any problems with newly compiled shared libraries: The new >> library functions will expect one parameter that is not actually there >> and will take whatever happens to be on the stack and pass it to the >Although you are likely to get away with this, it isn't strictly legal. Doesn't work for Windows DLLs, does it? ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Passing user data to password callbacks Bodo Moeller
- Re: Passing user data to password callb... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Passing user data to password c... Bodo Moeller
- Re: Passing user data to passwo... Damien Miller
- Re: Passing user data to pa... Bodo Moeller
- Re: Passing user data ... Bodo Moeller
- Re: Passing user data to passwo... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Passing user data to passwo... Ben Laurie
- Re: Passing user data to pa... Bodo Moeller
- Re: Passing user data ... Ben Laurie
- Re: Passing user data to pa... Ulf M�ller
- Re: Passing user data ... Bodo Moeller
- Re: Passing user data to password c... Damien Miller
- Re: Passing user data to password c... Ben Laurie
- Re: Passing user data to password callb... Holger Reif
- Re: Passing user data to password callbacks Dan Razzell
- Re: Passing user data to password callb... Damien Miller
- Re: Passing user data to password c... Dan Razzell
- Re: Passing user data to password callb... Clifford Heath
- Re: Passing user data to password c... Ben Laurie
