Chris Ridd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> Hi,
> 
> The DN string returned from the X509_NAME_oneline function has a 
> peculiar and non-standard format. (And undocumented too.)
> 
> I have some diffs which will turn it into the RFC 1779 format, as a 
> compile time option.
> 
> Would they be of any interest? Or should there be a new function which 
> returns the RFC format DN?

Why not 1485 or whatever superceded it (2253 I think)

-bp
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to