Clifford Heath wrote:
>
>
> > There are several functions that get removed by the defines that are
> > required elsewhere in the code that is non-rsa dependant code.
>
> Haven't used the latest cuts, but if no-rsa doesn't work any more, then
> it's because someone broke it, and it should get fixed.
>
> However in general it sucks that you have to build the archives, then
> try the DLL link to get the list of unsatisfied symbols to edit out of
> the .DEF file. I thought Eric was going to preprocess the .DEF file
> using the configuration defines to avoid this - did this ever happen?
Sort of but its not complete. The DEF generator manually deletes some
but not all of the symbols.
Wrt no-rsa there will be a new option in OpenSSL 0.9.5 RSA_NULL. This
all the RSA code except the RSA algorithm itself. That is you can still
process and generate RSA keys but not do RSA crypto. Attempts to do RSA
crypto fail with an error.
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk/
Personal Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior crypto engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/
Core developer of the OpenSSL project: http://www.openssl.org/
Business Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key: via homepage.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
