Calm down. I think we are missing the point here. (I don't want to sound
rude)
My original question still hasn't been answered yet. So please, I'm asking
you, this is really important to me. I'm a ICT engineer and I graduate this
year. This question is part of my thesis. I think you understand what that
means...
Now, not looking at the language used, is it possible to "painless" migrate
the openssl project into a dedicated webserver that is allready up and
running?
The code is available at www.goahead.com if anyone is interested...
Be kind and stick to the point, please.
Thank you.
Niels.
>From: "Terrell Larson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: c verses c++
>Date: Thu, 23 Dec 99 07:45:23 -0600
>
>So??? what are you saying? In general any good design and implementation
>is better than a bad one regardless of the
>choice of the implementation language. It appears to me that you are
>accusing the OpenSSL developers of producing a
>"hack"... Or did I interpret what you said properly?
>
>On Thu, 23 Dec 1999 09:56:13 +0100, Rene G. Eberhard wrote:
>
> >
> >> WHy woudl you transform it to C++. It adds about 50K to the
> >> executable on linux GCC and runs slower. I can't see much reason
> >> to use C++ for a library liek OpenSSL
> >
> >Your statement is not generally applicable! A C++ binary may be
> >a bit larger than a C++ binary. Wheter it runs slower depends
> >on the design. A proper OO design in C++ is (in general) faster
> >and more stable than a C hack without a design.
> >
> >Regards Rene
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
