Goetz Babin-Ebell wrote:
>
> At 08:00 11.01.00 +0200, Arne Ansper wrote:
> >
> >
> >> So any preferences or alternative suggestions?
> >
> >peek for iget and copy for rget
>
> peek is OK.
> copy is bad, suggesting you get a independent copy you can modify.
>
> link(ed) ?
>
Hmmm sometimes you do get a copy you can modify so thats another issue
:-(
OK those are possible alternative terms for 'get' what about 'set' and
'add'?
Steve.
--
Dr Stephen N. Henson. http://www.drh-consultancy.demon.co.uk/
Personal Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Senior crypto engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/
Core developer of the OpenSSL project: http://www.openssl.org/
Business Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] PGP key: via homepage.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
