> And what if sizeof (void (*)()) != sizeof (void *)? Think MS-DOS and all > those sick small/medium/large/huge memory models if you have to. I > realize it's a sick thought, but that's what the compiler complains > about and that's why "such a cast is not permitted by the standard." In this particular case I think the compiler is worried about alignment issues. Functions need to be aligned in a very specific way. Jeffrey Altman * Sr.Software Designer * Kermit-95 for Win32 and OS/2 The Kermit Project * Columbia University 612 West 115th St #716 * New York, NY * 10025 http://www.kermit-project.org/k95.html * [EMAIL PROTECTED] ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Andy Polyakov
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Bodo Moeller
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Dr Stephen Henson
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Matti Aarnio
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Jeffrey Altman
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Jeffrey Altman
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Michael Sierchio
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Jeffrey Altman
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Andy Polyakov
- RE: Sadistic C compiler... Salz, Rich
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Ben Laurie
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Andy Polyakov
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Andy Polyakov
- Re: Sadistic C compiler... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Sadistic C compile... Andy Polyakov
- Re: Sadistic C com... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Sadistic C com... Andy Polyakov