Seem you mailing-list program doesn't allow replying from a different
account from the one I'm subscribed to. Hence the retry:

Ulf Möller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> The randomness code in ./apps was named app_rand.c to avoid that kind
> of problems. So I guess we should rename one of the files.
> (crypto/asn1/pkcs8.c to crypto/asn1/p8_key.c or something?)

Good, thanks.

>> BTW2. After compiling 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT16012000, more undefined have crept
>> up; SHA_Init, SHA1_Init, SHA_Final, SHA1_Final etc. Is this also caused
>> by long file-names?
>
> No. Perhaps something went wrong with the ifdefs there. Could you mail
> me the command line used to compile crpyto/sha/sha1dgst.c and the
> output of "nm sha1dgst.o"?

Sorry for the false alarm. After recompiling with correct rsa_oaep.c,
all test-programs compiled fine (no more unresolved functions). I still
don't see where e.g. SHA_Init() is implemented.

But, 'destest' fails:
   Doing cbcm
   Doing ecb
   Doing ede ecb
   Doing cbc
   Doing desx cbc
>> des_xcbc_encrypt encrypt error
   Doing ede cbc
   Doing pcbc
   Doing cfb8 cfb16 cfb32 cfb48 cfb64 cfb64() ede_cfb64() done
   Doing ofb
   Doing ofb64
   Doing ede_ofb64
   Doing cbc_cksum
   Doing quad_cksum
   input word alignment test 0 1 2 3
   output word alignment test 0 1 2 3
   fast crypt test

If his normal or an known error? AFAIK des_xcbc_encrypt() only comes in
C (no asm-version). I use gcc 2.95.2 (djgpp version) with these CFLAGS:

  -DCRYPTO_MDEBUG -DREF_CHECK -DREF_PRINT -DMFUNC
  -Wformat -Wmissing-prototypes -Wmissing-declarations
  -malign-loops=2 -malign-jumps=2 -malign-functions=2
  -fno-strength-reduce -fomit-frame-pointer
  -m486 -Wall -O2 -DL_ENDIAN -D_ANSI_SOURCE -DDES_PTR -DDES_UNROLL
  -DBF_PTR2 -D__WATT32__ -I. -Icrypto -I/net/watt/inc

Gisle V.

______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to