bodo> > babinebell> I think we should seperate the functions handling values
bodo> > babinebell> and the functions handling callbacks:
bodo> > babinebell>
bodo> > babinebell> int BIO_ctrl_callback(BIO *bp,int cmd,long larg,int (*cb)());
bodo>
bodo> > Hmm, actually, I like that alternative. That allows us to go around
bodo> > the whole union/pass-by-value/and-so-on brouhaha... :-)
bodo>
bodo> Looks ok. Will you implement it?
Sure.
--
Richard Levitte \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken \ S-161 43 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
\ SWEDEN \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]