bodo> > babinebell> I think we should seperate the functions handling values
bodo> > babinebell> and the functions handling callbacks:
bodo> > babinebell> 
bodo> > babinebell> int BIO_ctrl_callback(BIO *bp,int cmd,long larg,int (*cb)());
bodo> 
bodo> > Hmm, actually, I like that alternative.  That allows us to go around
bodo> > the whole union/pass-by-value/and-so-on brouhaha...  :-)
bodo> 
bodo> Looks ok.  Will you implement it?

Sure.

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Redakteur@Stacken  \ S-161 43  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
                    \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-708-26 53 44
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis             -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to