Might be a good idea...



Thanks.
A suggestion however?

Not a top priority, but it would be nice to clean up these leaks, so that we
could detect leaks in our own code. I imagine we can do already this by
switching on and off the tracing, but it would be simpler to use.


----- Original Message -----
From: Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 5:15 PM
Subject: Re: memory leaks in SSLeay_add_all_algorithms?


> dykiel> Hello, the simple piece of code below results in "4243 bytes
leaked in 280 chunks" as reported by the CRYPTO debug memory functions.
> dykiel>
> dykiel> Most leaks are caused by the call to SSLeay_add_all_algorithms.
>
> No surprise there.  That function, and the functions called by it,
> register a number of algorithms by creating a hash table where the
> information needed is stored.
>
> dykiel> Some leaks are caused by the calls to the CRYPTO debug memory
> dykiel> functions, but I can  live with that.
>
> Equally unsurprising.  That one will also create a hash table to
> store the allocation information in, and sometimes another small hash
> table to store some thread-specific information in.
>
> dykiel> Am I missing some mandatory cleanup call? Anyone has tested
> dykiel> for mem leaks on other platforms? Any advice, experience?
>
> Those you've fuond aren't a big concern on most common systems,
> especially since those are one-time calls.  When a program exits, it's
> memory space is usually cleaned out by the operating system.  However,
> I imagine that some systems (was it Lennart B�ng who was playing with
> something like that?) do not work like that, and there might be a
> possibility for problems...
>
> --
> Richard Levitte   \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Chairman@Stacken   \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
> Redakteur@Stacken   \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-708-26 53 44
> Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis             -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>            Member of the OpenSSL development team
>
> Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
> See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
>


Reply via email to