Wasn't it pointed out that these 'shared' libraries do not contain
position-independent code and, therefore, when linked against they cause
private pages to be allocated so the data isn't 'shared' at all. A complete
waste of time!
Ron.
-----Original Message-----
From: Preston Gardner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, 16 March 2000 5:54
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Shared library for Solaris
The ultra-correct way to do it is to alter all the makefiles so that
everything gets linked as a .so.
Instead I have a Perl script (attached) that unarchives the .a files and
then rearchives them into a .so. You might have to make alterations to this
based on what version of Perl you have and whether you have a compiler
called CC that is like Sun's Workshop compilers. If you have no Perl at
all, well, you should (see www.perl.org <http://www.perl.org> ) or else
find another way.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Geeta Mahesh
Sent: Wednesday, March 15, 2000 2:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Shared library for Solaris
Hi there,
Can anybody give me direction on building openssl as a shared library for
solaris?
I am using openssl-0.9.4.
Regards,
Rajesh.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
