On Sat, Apr 01, 2000 at 05:58:29PM +0100, Ben Laurie wrote:
> Bodo Moeller wrote:
>> Function ssl2_read, formerly known as SSL2_read and (via a #define in
>> 0.6.6b) also as SSL_read, in file ssl/s2_pkt.c contains the following
>> confusing code and comment:
>>
>> /* If a 0 byte packet was sent, return 0, otherwise
>> * we play havoc with people using select with
>> * blocking sockets. Let them handle a packet at a time,
>> * they should really be using non-blocking sockets. */
>> if (s->s2->ract_data_length == 0)
>> return(0);
>> return(ssl2_read(s,buf,len));
>>
>> I believe that this is now wrong, and alreay was wrong in 0.6.6b. [...]
>> Am I right?
> [...] sounds right.
Are you working on reducing your e-mail backlog? That message of mine
is from April 1999, and I've already changed s2_pkt.c on April 22, 1999.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
