Yes, unfortunately the link is down. I have a copy on paper
I'll try to get it scanned and if the the images are clear I'll post
can post them on the mailing list. If you are still interested please 
follow this thread for the next coupla days.


Amit.

Fletcher Cocquyt wrote:
> 
> That URL comes up 404 - but the server is OK
> I am interested in the data - can you forward a
> working URL?
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Amit Chopra [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, May 08, 2000 6:08 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: SSL protocol overhead
> 
> The people at Tokyo Institute of Technology have done some performance
> maesurements. Their document might be of use to you.
> http://maruyama-www.cs.titech.ac.jp/~maruyama/papers/specwebssl/
> 
> Amit.
> 
> Douglas Lee wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone know what the protocol overhead is or how I can calculate it?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > --Douglas
> >
> > ______________________________________________________________________
> > OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
> > Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
> Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ______________________________________________________________________
> OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
> Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to