On Sat, Aug 12, 2000 at 12:34:38PM -0400, Jeffrey Altman wrote:
> I definitely do understand this. But since the software was exported
> from the U.S. without restrictions it is not legal in this country for
> the government to pass a law to apply retro-active restrictions to
> that software later on.
>From the BXA regulations:
Note to this paragraph: Neither review and classification nor
reexport licensing requirements are required under this section for
foreign finished products using U.S.-origin source code, toolkits
and components; yet the foreign finished products remain subject to
the EAR. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
^^^^^^^
I know very little about US law, but I think it is pretty obvious that
the US government can change the regulations for products that are
"subject to the EAR".
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Requests for Build chan... Ben Laurie
- Re: Requests for Build... Rich Salz
- Re: Requests for B... Ben Laurie
- Re: Requests for Build changes Jeffrey Altman
- Re: Requests for Build changes Dr Stephen Henson
- Re: Requests for Build changes Jeffrey Altman
- Re: Requests for Build changes Dr Stephen Henson
- Re: Requests for Build changes Ulf M�ller
- Re: Requests for Build changes Ben Laurie
- Re: Requests for Build changes Jeffrey Altman
- Re: Requests for Build changes Ulf M�ller
- Re: Requests for Build changes Jeffrey Altman
- Re: Requests for Build changes Ben Laurie
- Re: Requests for Build changes Jeffrey Altman
- Re: Requests for Build changes Jeffrey Altman
- Re: Requests for Build changes Jeffrey Altman
- Re: Requests for Build changes rsalz
- Re: Requests for Build changes Ben Laurie
- Re: Requests for Build changes amanda
- Re: Requests for Build changes Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Requests for Build changes Ben Laurie
