On Sun, Sep 10, 2000 at 02:53:32AM +0100, Dr S N Henson wrote:
> > PS. I can provide some more as it seems to be useful to integrate as much
> > as possible _before_ 0.9.6 comes out.
> > I have collected some experiences with BIO-pairs and related stuff. 
> 
> Well I'm just writing about the bits I've direct experience of or can
> quickly find out. BIO pairs doesn't come into that category (yet) so
> feel free.

Ok, I will prepare some more over the next days..

> Oh BTW, SSL_read() and SSL_write() can I believe return -1 and request a
> retried read or write even if the underlying BIO is blocking if the
> session is renegotiated. That problem has bitten a lot of people because
> it can cause problems with SGC, which renegotiates a session
> immediately.
> 
> Why should it do this? I've no idea but I'd always regarded it as
> anomalous and wouldn't be sorry to see this changed.

I am not sure whether my knowledge of this part of the code is intimate
enough to propose a change. I will have a look into the source anyway.

Best regards,
        Lutz
-- 
Lutz Jaenicke                             [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTU Cottbus               http://www.aet.TU-Cottbus.DE/personen/jaenicke/
Lehrstuhl Allgemeine Elektrotechnik                  Tel. +49 355 69-4129
Universitaetsplatz 3-4, D-03044 Cottbus              Fax. +49 355 69-4153
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to