From: Jeffrey Altman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> jaltman> A patch was posted to the mailing list several days ago that fixes jaltman> part of the problem; but not all of it. The function description jaltman> information in util/libeay.num and util/ssleay.num is not complete jaltman> enough to determine which functions should be excluded after the patch jaltman> is applied. Hmm, I did commit further changes to mkdef.pl, but didn't send the patches here. How about testing the latest snapshot to see if the problems have been fixed? Or if you prefer that, you can wait for beta2 which is scheduled on sunday... -- Richard Levitte \ Spannv�gen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chairman@Stacken \ S-168 35 BROMMA \ T: +46-8-26 52 47 Redakteur@Stacken \ SWEDEN \ or +46-709-50 36 10 Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/ Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/ Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400. See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: 0.9.6-beta1 with rand_win.c(1.9) built error with VC
Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker Thu, 14 Sep 2000 00:09:01 -0700
- 0.9.6-beta1 with rand_win.c(1.9) built error... zhu qun-ying
- Re: 0.9.6-beta1 with rand_win.c(1.9) bu... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: 0.9.6-beta1 with rand_win.c(1.9) bu... Jeffrey Altman
- Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
