> IMHO at least this type definition containing SET OF might lead to > different DER-encodings Nope. As others have pointed out DER defines a unique encoding for "SET OF" You might want to look at i2d_ASN1_SET in crypto/a_set.c > Can somebody with real OCSP experience say anything about this? I believe we found this the hard way at my old employer, but details are fuzzy. :) The CVS log for a_set.c shows: ---------------------------- revision 1.2 date: 1998/12/29 21:43:40; author: ben; state: Exp; lines: +91 -10 Fix incorrect DER encoding of SETs and all knock-ons from that. hope this helps. ______________________________________________________________________ OpenSSL Project http://www.openssl.org Development Mailing List [EMAIL PROTECTED] Automated List Manager [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: Object names Michael Str�der
- Re: Object names Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Object names Michael Str�der
- Re: Object names Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- OCSP and issuerNameHash (wa... Michael Str�der
- Re: OCSP and issuerNam... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- RE: OCSP and issue... Oscar Jacobsson
- Re: OCSP and issue... Michael Str�der
- RE: OCSP and issue... Oscar Jacobsson
- Re: OCSP and issue... Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- Re: Object names Rich Salz
- Re: Object names Michael Str�der
- Re: Object names Michael Str�der
- Re: Object names Jean-Marc Desperrier
- Re: Object names Jean-Marc Desperrier
- Re: Object names Michael Str�der
- Re: Object names Erwann ABALEA
- Re: Object names Dr S N Henson
- SV: Object names Hellan,Kim KHE
- Re: SV: Object names Richard Levitte - VMS Whacker
- RE: SV: Object names Frank Balluffi
