From: Ben Laurie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

ben> What does that matter? How often do we update any particular file? The
ben> point is that if I change it it has to rebuild the files before it takes
ben> effect. Why should I have to know that a "make update" is required to do
ben> this? Seems to me that part of the point of make is to remove the need
ben> to remember how things are built!

I agree with you there.  The way I did it was to not create too many
surprises.  Time to go away from that pattern, I guess :-).

ben> > In any case, I'm working on doing this completely differently,
ben> > basically reading OIDs and LDAP schemas straight of RFC's and similar
ben> > files...  But you know that already :-).
ben> 
ben> Yep, though how that works for things that have no OIDs, I don't know!

Uhmmm...  let's see, you wanna build OIDs from things that do not have
OIDs?  All the objects that we currently predefine have OIDs, so where
is the problem?  Nothing stops us from creating a module with the OIDs
we can't find anywhere else...

-- 
Richard Levitte   \ Spannvägen 38, II \ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Chairman@Stacken   \ S-168 35  BROMMA  \ T: +46-8-26 52 47
Redakteur@Stacken   \      SWEDEN       \ or +46-709-50 36 10
Procurator Odiosus Ex Infernis                -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Member of the OpenSSL development team: http://www.openssl.org/
Software Engineer, Celo Communications: http://www.celocom.com/

Unsolicited commercial email is subject to an archival fee of $400.
See <http://www.stacken.kth.se/~levitte/mail/> for more info.
______________________________________________________________________
OpenSSL Project                                 http://www.openssl.org
Development Mailing List                       [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Automated List Manager                           [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to